Kali Durga wrote:DeeBee wrote:I think she deserves some flak for it; because her opinion appears to be totally and completely uninformed.
An ignorant opinion is even less worthy of attention, much less fang baring. Unless it's an
influential ignorant opinion, which hers does not appear to be.
i keep wondering about this comment relative to the 'defanging' of jack and its not like i have an opinion but it does offer cause to pause and consider the cycle of violence
when it comes to press impact and media profusion ... surely you are not suggesting that the LA Weekly has no influence upon its readers and most certainly you are not discounting the idea that the commercial and fiscal agents associated with this publication would not be wise and do well when it comes to review the matter of racism
Honestly ignorance being broadcast in our media domain is one of the greatest forms of sinister disease in our nation and as a form of destructive humanity that exists
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-j ... statements
it is the sort of evil that strips children from the loving arms of their parents and exposes them to the toxic wasteland of commercialism before they can barely walk
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-j ... r-fox-sake
but i guess its not worthy of our attention or our direct and proactive efforts to correct it in no uncertain terms? wow... this is no debate... it is statement of fact
no offense intended to you Kali/Tam but anyone who would holds this sort of opinion may well need a decent retort as we both look in the face of evil in our midst
The clock in the kitchen says 2:55..... And the clock in the kitchen is slow
And *thanks for the topic repair*, hon. You rock, as always.
)